Democrat official part of effort to destroy Space Farms
Sussex County Democrats have fully embraced the ANTIFA practice of destroying their target's livelihood. This was posted on a New Jersey Herald story today:
Democrat State Committee member Ben Silva is using ANTIFA tactics in an attempt to damage the Space family farm and business. Silva, who identifies himself as the campaign manager for Democrat candidates Kate Matteson & Gina Trish, has been part of an effort to give Space Farms negative reviews on Facebook.
There have also been harassing calls made to family members and people who work there. These have included threats of violence.
Even the animals have been threatened... over their names.
One Matteson-Trish activist who admitted to calling and harassing employees actually compared Assemblyman Parker Space to Charles Manson.
All this over a photograph from a tailgate party at a Hank Williams Jr. concert, in which a photograph was taken of the Assemblyman and his wife in front of a Hank Williams Jr. band banner called "The Hank Williams Jr. Rebel Flag."
What is happening to the Space family is happening all over America right now. It's the most recent face of the old anarchist-communist movement -- now calling itself ANTIFA. As the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday, " Antifa activists also search for and publicize damaging information on their targets or opponents, or launch campaigns pressuring their bosses or companies to fire those opponents."
What Democrat Party officials like Ben Silva are doing to the Space Family and their farm business is right out of the ANTIFA playbook. Here is more from Monday's Wall Street Journal report:
Antifa activists believe in censorship and don’t rule out violence, as they showed again Sunday.
...They’re mostly anarchists and anarcho-communists, and they often refer to fellow protesters as “comrades.” Adherents typically despise the government and corporate America alike, seeing police as defenders of both and thus also legitimate targets.
The anti-fascist anarchist website CrimethInc.com recently summarized its philosophy: “In this state of affairs, there is no such thing as nonviolence—the closest we can hope to come is to negate the harm or threat posed by the proponents of top-down violence . . . so instead of asking whether an action is violent, we might do better to ask simply: does it counteract power disparities, or reinforce them?”
Antifa’s activists use the Orwellian-sounding notion of “anticipatory self-defense” to justify direct confrontation. That can include violence, vandalism and other unlawful tactics. Many draw a false moral distinction between damaging private property and “corporate” property.
Antifa activists have also developed their own moral justification for suppressing free speech and assembly. As anarchists, they don’t want state censorship. But they do believe it’s the role of a healthy civil society to make sure some ideas don’t gain currency.
So they heartily approve of the heckler’s veto, seeking to shut down speeches and rallies that they see as abhorrent. Antifa activists also search for and publicize damaging information on their targets or opponents, or launch campaigns pressuring their bosses or companies to fire those opponents.
Words don’t constitute violence, despite what Antifa activists believe. But there are dangerous ideas and practices, and the radical left has embraced several of them. Democracies solve conflict through debate, not fisticuffs. But Antifa’s protesters believe that some ideas are better fought with force, and that some people are incapable of reason.
Implicit in this view is that Antifa alone has the right to define who is racist, fascist or Nazi. It’s a guerilla twist on the culture wars, when a microaggression must be met with a macroaggression.
To read the entire Wall Street Journal report and view an interesting video on the subject, visit:
CNN has an excellent report called "Unmasking ANTIFA". You can access it here:
Kate Matteson and Gina Trish have gone too far. They should step away from these tactics and condemn them. Their failure to do so counts as an endorsement of them.