Sen. Cory Booker is “inconsistently” anti-Semitic… but enough to worry us.
New Jersey’s junior United States Senator is breaking the rules of the Senate for the purposes of partisan politics. Releasing confidential documents in the manner of a Chelsea Manning – except that he knows that he won’t be prosecuted for it because he is a powerful politician. Which kinda makes him a pussy.
No amount of media ass-licking is going to change that. No, Senator Booker is no “Spartacus” like in the movies or on cable TV. That Spartacus was a slave, not a Roman Senator. That said, he might be trying to fashion his own “Spartacus” movement. Who and what was the Spartacus movement?
Officially called the Spartacus League, it was founded during the First World War by a group of Marxist revolutionaries. They dropped the charade in 1919 and formally changed their name to the Communist Party of Germany. Through violent street demonstrations (note the blood in the illustration above) they helped to bring down the Social Democrats and Centrists of the Weimar Republic and pave the way for the National Socialists of you know who…
Which brings us to one of the great inconsistencies of Senator Cory Booker. That being, when he is in front of a Jewish audience, he couldn’t be more sympathetic and, in appearance, pro-Israel… but with anyone else, a different mask appears and you get antics like this…
Calling for the end to the border wall and other fortifications that protect Israel against terrorists is like calling for a second Holocaust. It is not enough that Cory Booker’s international allies have driven Jews out of every country they control, now he wants to tear down Israel’s protective barrier and allow them to march in to commence a pogrom of terror, torture, rape, and murder.
And to make matters worse, thanks to the Philadelphia Inquirer, now we know that Booker's fellow Democrat - Bob Menendez - is allowing his campaign to be run by a lobbyist for the foreign government of Qatar, one of the worse anti-Jewish culprits in the world and a government criticized by the United Nations and Amnesty International for its relaxed attitude towards modern slavery - human trafficking and the exploitation of children.
So why are Democrat congressional candidates Mikie Sherrill, Tom Malinowski, and Andy Kim silent on this? Is their silence an indication that they fear offending leftwing anti-Semites like Linda Sarsour of the Women's March? All three have posted positively about Sarsour, who has embraced the radicalism of Islamic extremists like Louis Farrakhan and Siraj Wahaj. Sherrill, Malinowski, and Kim were silent too last year, when Linda Sarsour called for "Jihad" against the elected government of the United States of America.
Mikie Sherrill is running for Congress in District 11 (against Republican Jay Webber).
Tom Malinowski is running in District 7 (against Republican Leonard Lance).
Andy Kim is running in District 3 (against Republican Tom MacArthur).
We need to pay as much attention to what Sherrill, Malinowski, and Kim refuse to talk about as we do to what they talk about.
As for Senator Booker. The best way to understand him is to remember Jack Nicholson’s answer to this question…